The assassination of Charlie Kirk shocked the political world, not only because of who he was but because of what it revealed: how fragile our public life has become when governance is built on coercion and monopoly power.

At nearly the same time, we were reminded of the murder of Iryna Zarutska, a 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee stabbed on a Charlotte train. Her killer had been arrested fourteen times before. Fourteen opportunities to protect society — and fourteen failures.

Two tragedies in different contexts, but both share a common thread: when governance is not accountable to the people it serves, the costs are measured in lives.

The Core Problem of Monopoly Power

Governments claim legitimacy through a “social contract,” yet ordinary people cannot opt out when those services fail. You can unsubscribe from cable or a gym membership. You cannot unsubscribe from government.

And when we look at government’s two essential functions — protection of life and administration of justice — its failures are glaring. Injustice piles up in courts. Violent criminals cycle through revolving doors. Political battles escalate until they turn bloody.

This is not a flaw of individual leaders but of systemic incentives. Bureaucrats, politicians, and power-seekers face little accountability because their customers — citizens — cannot walk away.

The Free Cities Alternative

Free Cities experiment with a different model: voluntary, contractual, and entrepreneurial governance. Residents are treated as customers who can leave if promises are broken. Accountability is backed not by vague theory but by enforceable contracts and the constant discipline of choice.

This model doesn’t promise perfection. But it does create incentives for governance to prioritize protection, justice, and peace — the very areas where monopolistic governments so often fail. And it removes the need for a winner-take-all struggle for power, reducing the polarization that so often spirals into violence.

Why It Matters Now

Every tragic headline reminds us: governance is not an abstract debate. It shapes life and death, peace and conflict, trust and fear. When systems monopolize power, people polarize. When governance is voluntary, people have hope.

Free Cities are still small, but they represent a practical step toward a future where tragedy is less likely — because governance is chosen, not imposed.

👉 Read more on Substack.

​