Joyce Brand
Tuesday, April 15, 2025
In today’s world, we are more empowered by technology than at any point in history—but also more confused and divided. While the internet gives us tools to access global knowledge and challenge old hierarchies, it also enables manipulation and undermines trust.
This contradiction has deep personal roots. For those raised during a time of institutional confidence, like the 1950s in the United States, televised events such as the assassinations of President Kennedy and Lee Harvey Oswald marked the beginning of skepticism. These moments, magnified by emerging media, revealed cracks in official narratives.
In the decades that followed—Vietnam, Watergate, the persecution of whistleblowers like Julian Assange and Edward Snowden—the role of technology became more complex. It exposed hidden truths but also allowed new channels for silencing dissent. Social media magnified voices, but also became a battleground for censorship, as highlighted by the release of the Twitter Files after Elon Musk’s acquisition.
The COVID crisis brought this tension to a head. Government overreach, selective enforcement, and inconsistent messaging left many reeling. Entrepreneurs and investors were especially vulnerable—tasked with navigating markets in an environment where even facts were contested.
As polarization intensifies, the hope lies not with political extremes, but with creators and problem-solvers. The future depends on those who use technology to build resilient, decentralized systems rooted in consent and transparency.
This moment in history challenges us to move beyond blind trust in authority and toward governance that earns our trust. Technology won’t save us—but used wisely, it can light the way.
Read on Substack
CEO Of Morazan Model Association
I am a woman who is passionate about freedom. I understand that freedom is an overused and misunderstood word. By freedom, I mean responsibility — specifically the responsibility of living without allowing any self-proclaimed rulers to make my moral judgments for me. A coercive government can impose negative consequences on me for disobeying its edicts, but I am free to the extent that I recognize my own responsibility for the risks I choose to take in following my own moral judgments. That is what it means to live free in an unfree world.
The label that I use to describe myself is voluntaryist because it is the clearest word I can think of to describe my most important belief — that all interactions between human beings should be voluntary. There is never any moral justification for the initiation of violence or coercion. The Morazan Model Association explores the implications of that core belief.
© 2023 – The Morazan Model Association. All rights reserved.